SUBMISSION EVALUATION

JUDGMENT: BORDERLINE PASS

Submitter (Perv):  I’m sure you must have some pics of Meg in your archives but I havent seen any yet which surprises me. She is simply beautiful……….

My Response:

Here is where we part judgment, I’m afraid.  If this site were called Perfect Face, she would pass and then some.  Those eyes, those lips, those cheekbones - she is absolutely gorgeous, gorgeous, gorgeous.

But alas, from a French Revolution point of view, we must judge her from the neck down (Distasteful Wit Alert).

Now, I have nothing at all against slim women. Heck, there are more than enough of ‘em in my archives.  But what I do have a problem with are spaghetti legs crowned by jutting hip bones.  Yes, I know she’s making the most of it here with what should normally be a curvy stance, but I’m just not buying it.

Ultimately, this is a straight-hipped skinny woman with not a great deal of toned female musculature.  A good sign of this type of figure:  When the spaghetti thighs look like they’ve been glued into the torso.  It’s also a good sign that if she ever ends up riding on top, you’ll also spend a lot of time grinding your tool against a jutting pubic bone - one of the drawbacks of skinny women. 

I should also make the point that these kinds of figures do not age well at all.  Should she ever gain weight, it will likely be in all the wrong places.  Those thighs will likely stay noodly even when the mid-section gets jellified.  That’s another problem with straight-hipped women.  Youth usually obscures the figure problems that escalate once they hit their 30’s. 

That’s why the Kim Kardashians of this world will have a far greater shelf life than the Paris Hiltons.  Yes, any man could be content going at the likes of Kim for three or more decades.  But to bed a bag of bones like Paris for that amount of time?  My guess is that you’ll be hitting the streets within a year or two of marriage to this kind of model, hunting the alleyways for anything curvy and syphillis-free for under $100.